Archive for the 'netneutrality' Category
Technology for the masses
Anyone that is aware of the net neutrality debate has an inkling of what this post’s title means. But its the most important concept of this decade, if not this century.
Prologue to progress
Technology, not for the first time in human history, has enabled communication on a formerly impossible scale. One of Lawrence Lessig’s talks, at TED, talked about how each advance of technology, from the printing press to the radio, at first, enabled wider communications for all. But then, they became commercialized, and what was once a two-way line of communication became one way; companies creating content, and consumers consuming content.
This is the way companies like it. To them, technology for the masses, means more money, more consumers for their content. Radio, reached millions of people without needing wires, yet, to reach them all, it required a large radio tower- a hefty investment. For this reason, radio quickly became, in the mainstream at least, less about conversations and sharing between two or more people, but about popular consumption.
We are facing the same problem, yet again, where a gigantic advance in communication has spurred a rash, no, a plague of creation like none before. Technology enables, always. It enables advance, progress, profit, and enlightenment.
Changes to communication
This current advance, the internet, has even spurred changes in what were formerly one-way communications technologies. Unable to afford to publish newspapers, we published blogs and podcasts. Unable to use radio to communicate, we began to use bbs(later known as forums), chat rooms, and instant messaging.
You can tell when a new technology or derivative thereof is reaching the mainstream when a store like Radioshack(aka The Source by Circuit City in Canada), sells home products meant for such technology/services. Radioshack/The Source sells a home stereo system, that can tune into most of your favourite internet radio stations!
Thats pretty mainstream, if you ask me. But that example is only one-way, broadcast communication, which is not the internet. Merely an old form, redone with the internet. Radio has become cheaper to do, thanks to the internet.
Enabling encouragement
That however, is not my point. Technology enables people. So long as it is two-way, so long as people can participate, it can inspire and further society and art. So long as there is open and neutral access for all, can technology enable societal advance.
We’ve seen, time after time, how groups can either self-destruct, or achieve great things. And thats the best part, the potential for that to happen. So long as there is the potential to do great things, be they code(Linux), music(OCRemix), etc, then it will be achieved. By someone, by a group somewhere.
This, though, galls the corporate overlords. They have no control over these productions. Why, god damn it, they’re not even making any money off of this! Thats just not right. To them at least. They want us to consume, to suckle at the teat of consumption. Then they can make money. Then they can control things. Creativity that is not shackled to corporate goals scares them. It genuinely scares them.
Let them be scared. Write, compose, direct, create. Make them scared. Challenge them on net neutrality, and take hold of your progress. Don’t be spoon-fed content, never be content with that. Always do, and create, instead of consume.
Moxie Motto’s!
If you do create, and realize that people want what you can create, never fall into the trap of the corporate overlords. The value of what you create, is the potential. Encourage participation, work, insight and criticism. Become better, enrich others. Participate.
That is the motto of this new generation, of this generation of poets and writers and programmers and artists.
Our motto:
I create, therefore I am human.
3 comments

